翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine ・ R v Mann ・ R v Manninen ・ R v Mapara ・ R v Marquard ・ R v Marshall ・ R v Marshall; R v Bernard ・ R v Martineau ・ R v Mataung ・ R v Mavros ・ R v McCraw ・ R v McCredie ・ R v McLean & Trinh ・ R v McManus and Harvey ・ R v Mercure ・ R v Miller ・ R v Mills ・ R v Mills (disambiguation) ・ R v Mkize ・ R v Mohan ・ R v Morales ・ R v Morgentaler ・ R v Morgentaler (1993) ・ R v Morris; Anderton v Burnside ・ R v Morrisey ・ R v Motomane ・ R v Mubila ・ R v Nedrick ・ R v Negus ・ R v Neil Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Miller ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Miller ''R v Miller'' () UKHL 6 is an English criminal law case demonstrating how actus reus can be interpreted to be not only an act, but a failure to act. ==Facts== Miller, a vagrant, accidentally set fire to a mattress in a house in which he was sleeping. Rather than taking action to put out the fire, he moved to a different room; the fire went on to cause extensive damage to the cost of £800. He was subsequently convicted of arson, under Sections 1 and 3 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971. Miller's defence was that there was no actus reus coinciding with mens rea. Although his reckless inattention to the fire could be said to constitute mens rea, it was not associated with the actus reus of setting the fire. Nevertheless, the defendant was convicted for recklessly causing damage by omission. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Miller」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.